Een hoge medewerker van het VN-kantoor voor de Mensenrechten heeft opgeroepen om een controversiële amnestie wet in Afghanistan te herzien. De Verzoeningswet gaat om een pardon en immuniteit voor leden van gewapende facties die voor december 2001 acties hebben bedreven.
TOP UN HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICIAL IN AFGHANISTAN CALLS FOR REPEAL OF AMNESTY LAW
The United Nations human rights office in Afghanistan today called for the repeal of a controversial amnesty law in the Asian country, saying that it green-lights impunity for serious crimes and continued rights violations.
“This law relieves Afghan authorities of their obligation to investigate and prosecute, on their own initiative, those allegedly responsible for gross violations of human rights,” Norah Niland, the Representative of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, told journalists today in Kabul.
“The law is likely to undermine efforts to secure genuine reconciliation, which is of course about bringing together different elements of a fractured society,” Ms. Niland added.
In 2007, Afghanistan’s Parliament approved the Reconciliation and General Amnesty Law, which provides blanket immunity and pardons former members of Afghanistan’s armed factions for actions committed prior to December 2001.
The UN has a global position that blanket amnesties are troubling, Ms. Niland said, because they prevent a country from dealing with the past and moving out of a crisis.
Asked if she supported repealing the law, Ms. Niland said: “The answer is the High Commissioner for Human Rights and Afghan civil society and human rights NGOs [non-governmental organizations] in and outside of the country have asked that the law be repealed.”
Ms. Niland also criticized the Shi’a personal status law – parts of which appear to sanction rape within the marriage – saying it “legitimized discriminatory practices against women.”
Meanwhile, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Afghanistan, Staffan de Mistura, met today with representatives from Hezb-e-Islami, a political party in Afghanistan.
The meeting was held in consultation with President Hamid Karzai and in accordance with the expanded mandate of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, which gives the operation a wider supporting role in preparation for parliamentary elections slated for September.
Mr. de Mistura indicated that the ongoing discussions with Afghan authorities further underscored the importance of Afghan-led dialogue to bring stability to this country.
UNAMA said in a pres release following the visit that the UN, as per its traditional role and expertise, will always be available to assist Afghans to find proper avenues for pursuing constructive political dialogue.
(VN: Mar 25 2010)
Posts tonen met het label mensenrechten. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label mensenrechten. Alle posts tonen
donderdag 25 maart 2010
maandag 22 december 2008
Closing Guantanamo Bay will end “dark chapter” in US history, stress UN experts
Een groep onafhankelijke specialisten van de VN op het gebied van de mensenrechten heeft de aankondiging van Obama om het gevangenkamp Guantanamo Bay te sluiten welkom geheten.
Er wordt niets gezegd in de verklaring van de VN over het gruwelijke gevangenkamp in Bagram, bij Kabul, dat door de VS wordt geleid. Volgens mensenrechtenorganisaties zijn de omstandigheden daar minstens net zo gruwelijk als in Abu Ghraib en Guantanamo Bay.
Closing Guantanamo Bay will end “dark chapter” in US history, stress UN experts
A group of independent United Nations human rights experts have welcomed United States President-elect Barack Obama’s announced decision close the Guantánamo Bay detention centre, stressing it will end “a dark chapter in the country’s history.”
In a statement issued in Geneva today, four UN human rights experts stated that “the regime applied at Guantánamo Bay neither allowed the guilty to be condemned nor secured that the innocent be released,” adding that it also opened the door for serious human rights violations.
Following his election in November, Mr. Obama publicly stated his commitment to lead his administration’s efforts to close the Guantánamo Bay prison camp and to strengthen the fight against torture. Both of which are part, he said, of his efforts “to regain America’s moral stature in the world.”
The experts strongly support his commitment which they said, in addition to restoring the moral stature of the US in the world, “will allow a dark chapter in the country’s history to be closed and to advance in the protection of human rights.”
They added that “moving forward with closing Guantánamo is a strong symbol that will help to repair the image of the country after damage by what was widely perceived as attempts at legitimising the practice of torture under certain circumstances.”
In addition to being illegal, detention there was “ineffective in criminal procedure terms,” said the experts, adding that similar severe abuses also occur at places of secret detention. “Thus, with the same emphasis, the experts urge that all secret detention places be closed and that persons detained therein be given due process.”
The experts also stressed that detainees facing criminal charges must be provided fair trials before courts that afford all essential judicial guarantees. “They emphatically reject any proposals that Guantánamo detainees could through new legislation be subjected to administrative detention, as this would only prolong their arbitrary detention,” the statement said.
Further, they called on third countries to facilitate the closure through their full cooperation in resettling those Guantánamo detainees that cannot be sent back to their countries of origin and, in this regard, welcomed the recent announcement of Portugal to accept detainees and called on other States to follow.
Among those adding his name to today’s statement is the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin, who warned a couple of months ago that the US Government’s system of military commissions planned for suspects detained at Guantánamo is not likely to reach international standards on the right to a fair trial.
He added that a visit to Guantánamo Bay in December 2007 confirmed his misgivings concerning the operation of the military commissions.
The US Supreme Court has in a series of cases pronounced itself on the rights of detainees at Guantánamo Bay. In its most recent decision, the Court found the Military Commissions Act unconstitutional and granted the detainees access to the federal courts’ jurisdiction, including the right to habeas corpus.
Today’s statement is also signed by the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Leandro Despouy; the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak; and the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Anand Grover.
The experts, who function in an independent and unpaid capacity, report to the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council.
(UN: Dec 22 2008)
Er wordt niets gezegd in de verklaring van de VN over het gruwelijke gevangenkamp in Bagram, bij Kabul, dat door de VS wordt geleid. Volgens mensenrechtenorganisaties zijn de omstandigheden daar minstens net zo gruwelijk als in Abu Ghraib en Guantanamo Bay.
Closing Guantanamo Bay will end “dark chapter” in US history, stress UN experts
A group of independent United Nations human rights experts have welcomed United States President-elect Barack Obama’s announced decision close the Guantánamo Bay detention centre, stressing it will end “a dark chapter in the country’s history.”
In a statement issued in Geneva today, four UN human rights experts stated that “the regime applied at Guantánamo Bay neither allowed the guilty to be condemned nor secured that the innocent be released,” adding that it also opened the door for serious human rights violations.
Following his election in November, Mr. Obama publicly stated his commitment to lead his administration’s efforts to close the Guantánamo Bay prison camp and to strengthen the fight against torture. Both of which are part, he said, of his efforts “to regain America’s moral stature in the world.”
The experts strongly support his commitment which they said, in addition to restoring the moral stature of the US in the world, “will allow a dark chapter in the country’s history to be closed and to advance in the protection of human rights.”
They added that “moving forward with closing Guantánamo is a strong symbol that will help to repair the image of the country after damage by what was widely perceived as attempts at legitimising the practice of torture under certain circumstances.”
In addition to being illegal, detention there was “ineffective in criminal procedure terms,” said the experts, adding that similar severe abuses also occur at places of secret detention. “Thus, with the same emphasis, the experts urge that all secret detention places be closed and that persons detained therein be given due process.”
The experts also stressed that detainees facing criminal charges must be provided fair trials before courts that afford all essential judicial guarantees. “They emphatically reject any proposals that Guantánamo detainees could through new legislation be subjected to administrative detention, as this would only prolong their arbitrary detention,” the statement said.
Further, they called on third countries to facilitate the closure through their full cooperation in resettling those Guantánamo detainees that cannot be sent back to their countries of origin and, in this regard, welcomed the recent announcement of Portugal to accept detainees and called on other States to follow.
Among those adding his name to today’s statement is the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin, who warned a couple of months ago that the US Government’s system of military commissions planned for suspects detained at Guantánamo is not likely to reach international standards on the right to a fair trial.
He added that a visit to Guantánamo Bay in December 2007 confirmed his misgivings concerning the operation of the military commissions.
The US Supreme Court has in a series of cases pronounced itself on the rights of detainees at Guantánamo Bay. In its most recent decision, the Court found the Military Commissions Act unconstitutional and granted the detainees access to the federal courts’ jurisdiction, including the right to habeas corpus.
Today’s statement is also signed by the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Leandro Despouy; the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak; and the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Anand Grover.
The experts, who function in an independent and unpaid capacity, report to the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council.
(UN: Dec 22 2008)
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)